Friday, March 30, 2007

Gone on holidays...

I'll be back after the Octave of Easter
(Man, am I looking forward to saying the h........-word again!)

To keep you entertained, here's a little game: The first person that names the following cardinals from top to bottom will..., will..., well, will win.

I know it's too easy, but - hey - is it my fault you guys know so much?











See y'all later!
Leo

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some easy, some hard. Some are wearing woolen birettas and some silk. Could be seasonal.
1. ?
2. unmistakably Eugene Tisserant, in later years
3. Bacci
4. ? Pla y Daniel??
5. Cushing
6. Landazuri Rickets (in Franciscan grey rabbit fur)
7. Laraonna
8. Rugambwa, 1st modern African card.
9. Tampouni?
10. Tardini (1958)

12:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The woolen and silk birettas are seasonal, however a couple are improperly dressed as the ermine is paired with the watered silk biretta or vice versa, obviously a no-no!Great little contest!

6:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course they're seasonal. It is unlikely that any cardinal in Rome (I can gestimate that ALL these photos have been taken in Rome) was inappropriately dressed. It is likely that the protocols for certain ceremonies, even in ecclesiastical winter, required the woolen biretta. perhaps the reception of the gallero. After all, the watered-silk biretta is an innovation. The cappa is always di setta ondulata.

2:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I mean in winter, with the silk biretta.

2:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know that. My point is that Cardinal #4 (Pla y Daniel?) is wearing ermine (winter) with a watered silk biretta (summer) and the great Tardini is doing the same in his photo. What you say about certain Roman ceremonies may be true...but the fact is that, as is, those two have an improper combination. We're just being lighthearted here.

6:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4 could be Mimmi of Naples

2:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And, I meant Pla y Daniel for 4

2:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

uh, for 1.

2:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home